Monday, 31 August 2015

CINESCENT, by Gabriela Guidetti (August 2015)



Angel (by Thierry Mugler, 1992) 
VS.
 Chocolat (by Lasse Hallström, 2000)


"Happiness. Simple as a glass of chocolate or tortuous as the heart. Bitter. Sweet. Alive."
(From the book "Chocolat", by Joanne Harris)



In 1992 Olivier Cresp and Yves de Chiris created, for the Maison Thierry Mugler, one of the most discussed, loved and hated fragrance in the history of perfumery: Angel. 



Whatever you think, Angel is one of the most iconic perfumes ever made, a scent that influenced many other fragrances, and created thousands of perfume-addicts since the 90s. Smelling a drop of Angel does not leave emotionless: at first the sweetness of the fragrance is so intense to be excessive for a few people. 



Volumes have been written about this olfactory masterpiece. We are talking about the gourmand fragrance par excellence, where yellow fruits, marzipan and cotton candy notes explode at first smell, wrapped in a patchouli, woody and intense, to inebriate noses. Patchouli walks together with the fragrance to the base notes, where it is blended with greedy and creamy notes such as honey, vanilla, chocolate and caramel. Base notes are the masterpiece of "Angel": a drydown that bewitched thousands of admirers.



Wearing Angel is similar to sending us back in childhood; it brings back memory of candy stores, without ever being cloying, because patchouli gives an almost masculine cotè, balancing and making the fragrance so sensual. Tasty sweetness and carnal charme, it's like a chocolate melting in the mouth, and releasing all its flavor to satisfy the heart and soul. 



Just as "Chocolat", the 2000 movie directed by Lasse Hallström. 
The movie narrates the story of Vianne (Juliette Binoche), a fascinating and mysterious woman who open a chocolate shop with her daughter in a small town in Northern France, Lansquenet-sous-Tannes. Thanks to her chocolate, Vianne manages to bring sunrays in the colorless and repressed lives of the the people in the small town. 



One day some gypsies drop anchor in the river next to Lansquenet. Among these gypsies, Vianne makes friend with Roux (Johnny Depp) who will leave a mark in her heart. Among the many sequences remained in our hearts, there's one that seems to smell like Angel: the dance between Vianne and Roux on the notes of Caravan.
VIDEO
VIDEO

It's evening. The party organized by Vianne is over and the chocolate dessert was served on the Roux's boat. The last guests, now satiated, are relaxing on the chords of gypsy music. She is collecting the used dishes when Roux invites her for one last dance. Vianne is uncertain, but agrees. The sound of guitars languidly drives the dance steps, first uncertain, then smoother. 



Vianne slowly indulges in his arms. Faces are approaching, bodies are very close. Viannes's alabaster skin is illuminated by the light of torches. Her hands smell chocolate. His golden skin vibrates sensually. Anouk, Vianne's daughter, is watching them dance and smiles. 



The tenderness of childhood that Mugler wanted to evoke with Angel, shines on Anouk's lips. 
Angel drives each dance step and every glance between the two dancers. The seductive sweet touch of gourmand notes drives Vianne's moves and the aromatic intensity of the patchouli spreads from Roux's body. The music notes intersect with olfactory ones, and the result is a perfect balance of vibrations descending into the hearts to turn on a flame, and binding the two lovers.



You can't forget a woman like Vianne: strong, free, charming and unconventional. As well as Angel, a heavenly scent that brings to the extreme the gourmand concept, an innovative fragrance that had been able to survive times, fashions, and detractors, as any great olfactive creation. Maybe a few drops of Angel felt in the dough of magic sweets served at La Chocolaterie Maya



Inside Vianne's chocolates you can find her sparkling soul that has been able to give to others happiness and joy. The same happens with Angel. And if it's true that chocolate is gratifying and so addictive, it's the same for the perfume created by Olivier Cresp and Yves de Chiris more than twenty years ago, a scent that enlightened generations of fans, totally dependent and bewitched by its unique and original jus.



Angel – Thierry Mugler, 1992.
Eau de Parfum
Noses: Olivier Cresp e Yves de Chiris
Family: Oriental Vanilla
The eau de parfum includes notes of Bergamot, Mandarine, Passion Fruit, Peach, Apricot, Marzipan, Cotton Candy, Honey, Patchouli, Vanilla, Chocolate and Caramel



Chocolat (Chocolat), 2000.
Director: Lasse Hallström
Cast: Juliette Binoche, Judi Dench, Alfred Molina, Lena Olin, Johnny Depp, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugh O'Conor, John Wood, Peter Stormare, Leslie Caron.
Based on the novel Chocolat by Joanne Harris
Music by Rachel Portman
Cinematography by Roger Pratt





Previous chapters:
Murasaki (Shiseido) VS Dressed to Kill (Brian de Palma)
White Linen (Estèe Lauder) VS Out of Africa (Sidney Pollack)



---------------------------------------------------
"Angel" by Thierry Mugler 
through the years


Year 1992-1993

Year 1992-1993


Year 1996-1997

Year 1997

Year 2000-2001


Year 2000-2001

Year 2002: 10th Anniversary


Year 2004

Year 2004

Year 2006

Year 2006

Year 2008


Year 2012: 20th Anniversary


Year 2013

Year 2014




-----------------------------(ITALIAN)-------------------------------------------

Angel di Thierry Mugler (1992) vs Chocolat di Lasse Hallström (2000)

"Happiness. Simple as a glass of chocolate or tortuous as the heart. Bitter. Sweet. Alive."
(From the book "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris)

Nel 1992 Olivier Cresp e Yves de Chiris crearono per la Maison Thierry Mugler una delle fragranze più discusse, amate e odiate della storia dell'arte profumiera: Angel. Comunque la pensiate Angel rimane uno dei profumi più iconici mai realizzati, un profumo che ha influenzato moltissime altre fragranze successive e che ha creato centinaia di migliaia di perfumer addicts dagli anni '90 fino a oggi. Annusare una goccia di Angel non lascia mai indifferenti: la prima volta la dolcezza della fragranza è talmente intensa che per alcuni risulta essere eccessiva. Fiumi di parole sono stati scritti su questo capolavoro olfattivo. Stiamo parlando del profumo gourmand par excellence, dove note di frutta gialla, marzapane, e cotton candy esplodono al primo assaggio, avvolte da un patchouli tanto legnoso e intenso da inebriare il naso. Il patchouli accompagna tutta la fragranza fino al fondo dove si mischia a note golosissime e cremose di miele, vaniglia, cioccolata e caramello. Le note di fondo sono il capolavoro di Angel, quel drydown che ha stregato migliaia di estimatori.
Indossare Angel fa tornare bambini, fa ricordare i negozi di dolciumi della nostra infanzia, senza mai essere stucchevole perché il patchouli regala quel cotè quasi maschile che equilibra e rende sensuale la fragranza. Golosa dolcezza e fascino carnale, come un cioccolatino che si scioglie in bocca liberando tutto il suo sapore che appaga il cuore e l'anima. Come Chocolat, film del 2000 diretto da Lasse Hallström. Il film narra la storia di Vianne (Juliette Binoche), donna misteriosa e affascinante che con la figlia apre una cioccolateria in un paesino della Francia del Nord, Lansquenet-sous-Tannes. Grazie al suo cioccolato Vianne riuscirà a portare un raggio di luce nella vita incolore e repressa degli abitanti della piccola cittadina. Un giorno alcuni zingari gettano l'ancora nel fiume vicino a Lansquenet. E tra questi zingari Vianne farà amicizia con uno in particolare, Roux (Johnny Depp) che lascerà un segno nel suo cuore. Tra le tante sequenze rimaste anche nel nostro cuore ce ne è una che sembra profumare di Angel: il ballo tra Vianne e Roux sulle note di Caravan.
E' sera. La festa organizzata da Vianne è finita e il dessert al cioccolato è stato consumato sulla barca di Roux. Gli ultimi invitati ormai sazi si stanno rilassando sugli accordi di musiche gitane. Lei sta raccogliendo i piatti quando Roux la invita per un ultimo ballo. Vianne è incerta, ma accetta. Il suono delle chitarre accompagnano languidamente i passi di danza, dapprima incerti poi sempre più sciolti. Vianne piano piano si abbandona tra le braccia di Roux. I visi si avvicinano, i corpi si sfiorano. La pelle di alabastro di Vianne è illuminata dalla luce delle torce accese. Lei ha le mani che sanno di cioccolata. La pelle dorata di lui vibra di sensualità. Anouk, la bimba di Vianne, li guarda ballare e sorride. La tenerezza dell'infanzia che Mugler aveva desiderato evocare con Angel risplende sulle labbra di Anouk. Angel accompagna ogni passo di danza e ogni sguardo tra i due ballerini. La golosità seduttiva delle note gourmand guida le movenze di Vianne e l'intensità aromatica del patchouli emana dal corpo di Roux. Le note musicali si intrecciano alle note olfattive e il risultato è un perfetto equilibrio di vibrazioni che scendono nei cuori per accendere la fiamma e suggellare l'unione tra i due innamorati.
Vianne è una donna che non si dimentica facilmente: forte, libera, affascinante e anticonformista. Così come Angel, un profumo celestiale che ha portato all'estremo il concetto di gourmand, un profumo innovativo che come le ogni grande creazione olfattiva ha saputo sopravvivere al tempo, alle mode e ai detrattori. Forse qualche goccia di Angel è caduta nell'impasto dei magici dolci serviti a La Chocolaterie Maya. Nei cioccolatini di Vianne si può trovare l'anima scintillante della sua creatrice che ha saputo donare agli altri felicità e gioia. Così è per Angel e se è vero che il cioccolato gratifica e dà dipendenza anche il profumo creato da Olivier Cresp e Yves de Chiris oltre vent'anni fa ha illuminato intere generazioni di appassionati totalmente dipendenti e stregati dal suo jus unico e originale.



Angel – Thierry Mugler 1992
Eau de Parfume
Naso: Olivier Cresp e Yves de Chiris
Famiglia: Vaniglia Orientale
Il profumo racchiude note di bergamotto, mandarino, pesca, albicocca, frutto della passione, marzapane, cotton candy, miele, patchouli, vaniglia, cioccolato, caramello

Chocolat (Chocolat) – 2000
Regia: Lasse Hallström
Cast: Juliette Binoche, Judi Dench, Alfred Molina, Lena Olin, Johnny Depp, Carrie-Anne Moss, Hugh O'Conor, John Wood, Peter Stormare, Leslie Caron.
Ispirato al romanzo Chocolat di Joanne Harris
Musica di Rachel Portman
Fotografia di Roger Pratt


Monday, 24 August 2015

Rare Italian vintage Advertisements (week 31)



Asja, Fendi, year 1992


Mila Schon Uomo, year 1992



Ferrè for Men, Year 1994


K de Krizia, year 1991



Blonde, Versace, Year 1996


Ghibli, Atkinsons, year 1984


Armani, year 1986



--------------------------------------------------
previous vintage
advertisements:

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

"FRACAS" vs. "Fracas": side-by-side.





I love Fracas. It's one of the strongest, heaviest, most intense female scents, and it brings me back to my childhood.
"Fracas de Robert Piguet" is, since 1948, the epitome of tuberose. 
Actually, Fracas is the benchmark for all tuberose-based scents, yesterday and today.
You could read volumes about this perfume, searching on the net, so I'll not waste many words about it, because a lot of perfume experts have written very interesting reviews examining Fracas. You will find a list of interesting reviews at the end of this article. 
One of the most intriguing aspects about Fracas is its recent story: it was produced by historical "Robert Piguet Parfums" until the end of Seventies. Then, during 1985, a few Piguet scents (Fracas, Bandit...) were reformulated, produced and distributed under "Alfin Fragrances Inc.", a well-known american luxury firm, under its Swiss division "Orinter".
Two different bottles were produced by "Alfin/Orinter" : a transparent bottle (1985-1990) and an opaque black one (1990-1995).

"Alfin/Orinter" stopped Fracas production in 1995, and sold Robert Piguet Parfums to "Fashion Fragrances &Cosmetics Ltd". It took a certain amount of time to completely re-orchestrate the scent, and finally to relaunch it, in 1998, with the prestigious label of the "original Fracas formula, certified by Givaudan". Apparently, this new, certified scent underwent at least a couple of reformulations after year 2007, due to IFRA restrictions.
Searching all over the net, you will find a general consensus about the "rogue", "poor quality", "watered down", "deprecable" version produced by "Alfin/Orinter" (1985-1995), opposed to the new, back-to-original, magnificent, and "certified by Givaudan" version produced since 1998 (and -even more- to the legendary 1950s-1960s historical version).
Is it true? Did 1980s Fracas perform really so bad, compared to the new one? It's almost impossible to say, since "Alfin/Orinter" bottles from the 1980s are very, very rare, and almost impossible to find, so it's very difficult to perform a side-by-side comparison. 
Until now....
Well, I was incredibly lucky, because our beloved Gianni from Milan remembered to have an old Fracas tester, in the transparent bottle (the first one, produced during 1985-1990), stored in one of his basements. He generously borrowed it to me, to perform a side-by side comparison with a modern version produced by "Fashion Fragrances&Cosmetics Ltd" (actually, this "new" bottle is a year 2009 one).
In my opinion, this is the first time that someone put two different Fracas bottles side-by-side for testing. Let's go and see the results!


HERE ARE THE PLAYERS:


OLD BOX AND BOTTLE, first serie (1985-1990) (TESTED)
FRACAS first serie, Eau de Toilette, in a transparent bottle (years 1985-1990),
 produced and distributed by Alfin Fragrances Inc./Orinter

(note the word "FRACAS" in capital letters) (from E bay)

OLD BOX AND BOTTLE, second serie (1990-1995) (NOT TESTED)
(from E bay) Fracas, second serie, black bottle (years 1990-1995),
always produced by "Alfin Fragrances Inc" in a different box
and bottle (note the word Fracas in lowercase letters,
 and the production for "Orinter, Geneva, Switzerland" )

MODERN BOX AND BOTTLE (since 1998) (TESTED)
This is the modern "Fracas" Eau de Parfum black bottle, since 1998, produced by
"Fashion Fragrances&Cosmetics Ltd" and "certified by Givaudan".

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

BOTTLES SIDE-BY-SIDE FOR TEST
old "Alfin Fragrances Inc."/"Orinter" Eau de Toilette bottle (1985-1990) on left.
modern "Fashion Fragrances&Cosmetics Ltd" Eau de Parfum bottle (year 2009) on right

Bottom of the bottles


Bottom of modern bottle (year 2009) used during the test 


Modern Fracas Eau de Parfum 
(since 1998, bottle in picture actually dated year 2009)

Older Fracas (1985-1990) Eau de Toilette

----------------------------------------------------------
The Olfactive Pyramid
 The Pyramid, according Robert Piguet Parfums.

--------------------------------------
MATERIALS AND METHODS

As usual, if you want to perform a serious test (single test or side-by-side), you should use at least three different surfaces, in order to have different conditions to compare. 1) Test on paper; 2) Test on skin; 3) Test on fabric.

Side-by-side with paper strips


Test on skin (I personally prefer the back of the hand)
side-by-side, both hands.
Test on fabric (side-by-side, two piece of same fabric)
Heavy fabric traps a lot of scent and performs very well.

-----------------------------------------
TESTS and RESULTS

Unusually, I compared an "Eau de Toilette" (old transparent bottle) with an "Eau de Parfum" (new black bottle) and the first big surprise is that there are not so many differences in longevity and sillage. Both performs almost identically. But let's say it honestly: if you know Fracas, you should know it's a real Top Performer, in both longevity and sillage. On paper strips and on fabric, both old and new versions "stand" for more than a week (!!!). 
Really, Fracas, old or newis an intoxicating scent. If you love heavy, persistent floral scents, search no more. You have find it. Only old Balenciagas can perform in similar way. If you spray Fracas on any surface, stay sure it will remain for days. If you spray Fracas on your skin, a shower will not enough to remove it. The marvellous tuberose blast will remain stick on you, like an aromatic glue.
But what about the two versions? 
Let's check the tuberose first: actually, when you consider Fracas, you want the tuberose at its highest level. 
And I am pleased to say that no one will be disappointed. In both versions, old and new, tuberose performs exceptionally good and with the same strenght (no difference between EdT and EdP). In both cases, you smell unmistakably Fracas. You will recognize it immediately. Tuberose is a real smash in your face (or, in your nose). 
But is there any difference between old and new? Definitely yes! There are differences, but are subtle ones. Subtle differences between old and new are in the supporting notes (Jasmine, Violet, Bergamot, Musk....)
In the old transparent bottle produced by "Alfin/Orinter" the tuberose is literally surrounded by a "buttery" aura. Actually, you are smelling a tuberose submerged in a deep sea of butter. It's really pleasant, indeed, especially if you love "buttery" perfumes.
In the new formulation, on the contrary, the "buttery" notes, although present, quietly stand aside. 
The other difference (maybe derivating from the buttery note) is the sharpness.
The old bottle has softer notes -tuberose apart- and Violet, Bergamot and Jasmin appear almost smudged, "blurred", "overlapped", almost non recognizable each other.
The new formulation has different sharp notes, accurately separated each other; intense, clean, well defined. 
I'd say: notes sharp like razors.
If pictures say a thousand words, here are the examples:

old FRACAS, the transparent bottle from the Eighties: 
all notes in the background don't appear sharp, but almost "blurred"

old FRACAS, the transparent bottle from the Eighties: 
all notes in the background don't appear sharp, but almost blurred

And here is the new version: all notes are really sharp, not confused, not blurred.

New Fracas, in the modern black bottle:
 all notes in the background appear sharp, clean and refined
New Fracas, the modern black bottle: all notes in the background 
appear sharp, clean and refined

As a conclusion, I'd say both version are really, really good. When you talk about Fracas, you want essentially a tuberose at highest level.
And both version perform in an excellent way. 
Tuberose is magnificent both in old and new version.
In a nutshell, there are two mayor differences between old and new Fracas. A) the creamy aspect, much more relevant in the old version; B) the sharpness of single notes, more relevant in the new version.
It is possible that the high "creaminess" in the old version blurs all other notes; if it's true, the lower creaminess in the new version allow to appreciate better the jasmine, the violet, the bergamot still present in the scent.
What's the best of two? In this case, there is no better and no worse. 
I feel very comfortable with both and don't have a particular preference.
If you prefer "a buttery tuberose", try to find an old bottle.
If you prefer "a sharp tuberose", with all notes perfectly recognizable, go for the new. 
In any formulation, Fracas is still a benchmark in perfumery.



--------------------------------------------------
BONUS SECTION

HOW TO RECOGNIZE "Fracas" BOTTLES

----------------------------------------------------

by % VOLUME

the old "Alfin/Orinter" black bottles (produced in 1990-1995) are very similar to the modern ones, BUT have the volume percentage on the front of the box, bottom right.
(in this case "90% Vol.")


On the contrary, new, modern boxes (since 1998) 
have NO indication about percentage on the front of the box.




-----------------------------------------------------
by STICKERS

All modern bottles (since 1998) have a sticker on the bottom reporting:
"Fashion Fragrances&Cosmetics Ltd", and:
1998-2004: "New York" address only.
2004-2009: "NY" plus "Amstelveen, Netherlands."
2010- to date: "NY" plus "Thorigny sur Marne, France"


First type sticker: "New York" address only, 1998-2004

Second-type sticker, adding address: "Amstelveen, Netherlands"
= years 2004-2009

Third type sticker: 
Address: "Thorigny sur Marne, France
(since years 2009- 2010)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by CERTIFICATIONS

ALL modern boxes (since 1998) have a 
"certification by Givaudan" signed by President.
1998-1999: Geoffrey W. Webster
2000-2003: Errol G.W. Stafford
2004-2014: Michael Carlos

The FIRST box =  years 1998-1999
Signed by Geoffrey R. Webster

The SECOND box =  years 2000-2003
Signed by E.G.W. Stafford


The THIRD box =  years 2004-2014
signed by  Michael Carlos

(from Ebay) another bottle signed 
by "Michael Carlos" (= after 2004)

---------------------------------------
GENERIC CLUES


Remember: until 2004-2005 only the short list of ingredients was reported on the box ("Alcohol, Perfume, Water, colorants....")
After 2005, the long list of ingredients/allergens became mandatory.


note the SHORT list of ingredients, used before 2005

note the LONG list of ingredients/allergens, 
adopted after 2004-2005

-------------------------------------------------

Interested in Fracas?
read here..... 

Robert Piguet perfumes blog 
Yesterday's Perfumes
Into the Gloss
NowSmellThis
New York Times (by Chandler Burr)
Boisdejasmin
Kafkaesque Blog 
The Candy Perfume Boy
Olfactoria's Travels
The Non Blonde
Sweet Diva




------------------------------------------
A FINAL WORD...

Usually, when I perform a test, I try to contact the perfume house to get first-hand, genuine, authentic infos.
In most cases, I get no answer at all. In a few cases, I receive some elusive, vague answers. Very rarely I obtain really useful infos.
Well, I'm glad to say -in this case- I contacted "Robert Piguet Parfums", and I found an immensely kind person, very friendly, open-hearted and enthusiast, who gave me all infos I needed.
Thank you very much.