raidersofthelostscent

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

"DIOR HOMME" : 9-batches blind test

Posted on November 13, 2013 by niten

dior homme intense


For the DIOR HOMME INTENSE tests see here
For the batch-numbers code ("Christian Dior"), see here
For the "Year 2014" update, see here.


Dior Homme, the Eau de Toilette launched in 2005, had a lot of controversies similarly to its bigger brother EdP "Homme Intense", because of a "reformulation" that took place during previous years (as in the "Intense" version) and sparked speculations of all kinds (and hoarding, and obviously price increases).
In this article, an analysis of the alleged differences between the various years of "Dior Homme" will occur, using a total of NINE different bottles from 2005 up to 2013.
Assuming that reformulation happened somewhere in 2010- 2011, we have:
- two bottle batched year 2005: the earlier ones produced
- a bottle batched year 2008
- a bottle batched year 2009
- a bottle batched year 2011
- two bottle batched year 2012
- two bottle batched year 2013
(see pictures below)
The test was conducted according to the rules of the "blind test" ( you will find a summary here ).
Since it's very difficult, even for a skilled nose, to "detect" differences between 9 similar samples, test were "splitted" using only 3-4 paper stripes each time, reporting differences every time and re-mixing stripes after each test.

RESULTS
If the most important question to answer is: did a reformulation happen, or not?, similarly to the "Dior Homme Intense" tests, well, the answer is *difficult*: while in the EdP (Intense) version a difference between batches is clearly evident -although slightly-, in the EdT differences between batches are more subtle, and only related to 2011 and 2012 bottles. these two years appear *maybe* a bit lighter than others. During the blind tests, it's rather difficult to detect REAL differences between (for example) year 2005 and year 2012: there is an impression of "lighter/heavier" samples only. You could guess to spray twice the "reformulated" bottles, to obtain the same effect of "vintage".
Then, year 2013 bottles are nearly identical to the early ones: even the juice appear -side-by-side- with the same, identical color (see pictures).
More, there are no differences between years from 2005 up to 2009.
Overall, it seems for two years (2011-2012) there were a "lighter" version, but now (year 2013) the scent has been restored to the "early" version.


CONCLUSIONS:
If discussions about the reformulation of "Dior Homme Intense" seemed to be the classic "storm in a tea cup", in the case of "Dior Homme" (EdT version) there are no storms at all. The scent is very good and performs the best on clothes more than "on skin". Actually, both Dior Homme (EdT and Intense) are scents mainly intended to be sprayed on clothes.
On fabric/textiles, differences are even more negligible. All you obtain is a marvelous fragrance of Iris and Vanilla with a light Cocoa background (EdT version), or with a stronger amount of Cocoa (Edp, Intense Version).
Don't be fooled by "reformulation" discussions, this is not the case: there are immensely worse reformulations around.
Dior Homme and Dior Homme Intense are very good scents, in every incarnation.

(UPDATE: according to some, during late 2013 (september-october) another "reformulation" happened: to be verified soon).



raiders of the lost scent
Differences between early and late boxes:
"Eau de Toilette" is written inside the black square.

raiders of the lost scent
Early bottles: batch numbers on back of the bottle (not bottom)
batch code 5F03 (year 2005)

raiders of the lost scent
Another "vintage" box batched 5H02 (year 2005):
note the word "LIMONENE" in the ingredients list:
it's always in the FIRST row.
raiders of the lost scent
Year 2013 box batched 3P01: the ingredient "LIMONENE"
it's in the second row (not in the first row anymore)

raiders of the lost scent
batch code 2P02 = year 2012  (black stem)

raiders of the lost scent
Batch code 1V01 = year 2011
(it's not "vintage", ingredient LIMONENE is in second row)

raiders of the lost scent
Year 2008 (8X02)  and year 2013 (3N02) boxes
(ingredients are different: "vintage" boxes report "LIMONENE" in the first row)


raiders of the lost scent
year 2013 and year 2008 comparison: same juice color
(black stem bottle appears slightly darker due to black reflections)


raiders of the lost scent
9-batches test from 2005 up to 2013

raiders of the lost scent
Blind test

raiders of the lost scent
Dior "Homme" (and "Homme Intense") :
BEST results are on clothes (fabric/textiles),
more than "on skin".
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Christian Dior, Tests | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • DIOR HOMME INTENSE 2007-2013 : 9 BATCHES BlindTest.
    ( UPDATE : in this article you will read the "years 2007-2013" review: if you are interested in the "year 2014" updated ...
  • How to recognize CHANEL perfumes.
    (note: this method is valid only for bottles sporting the 4-numbers batch code) Chanel is one of the most difficult "Maisons", whe...
  • OPIUM: Vintage Bottles Parade.
    "It will be the Greatest, and we will call it  Opium "   (Yves Saint Laurent, 1976) A show trying to identify Opium bottles throug...

Categories

  • ad
  • advertisement
  • advertisements
  • Angel
  • Armani
  • Aromatics Elixir
  • Azzaro pour homme
  • Bandit
  • Barbarella
  • batch
  • Batch code
  • batch codes
  • Batch-codes
  • Bleu de Chanel
  • Books
  • Boss
  • Bulgari
  • Cacharel
  • Calandre
  • Capucci
  • Caron Perfumes
  • carven.
  • Cerruti
  • Chanel
  • Chocolat
  • Christian Dior
  • cinema
  • Cinescent
  • Clinique
  • Courreges
  • DHI
  • Dior
  • Dior Homme Intense
  • Dior Homme Intense Parfum 2014
  • Diorling
  • Donna Karan
  • Eau de Parfum
  • Eau du Coq
  • Ex Machina.
  • Facebook
  • Fahrenheit
  • Fahrenheit Guide
  • Fleurs de Rocaille
  • Fracas
  • Fragrances
  • Fundamental
  • Gabriela Guidetti
  • GC-MS
  • GCMS
  • Genny
  • Gilda
  • Givaudan
  • Givenchy
  • Guerlain
  • Habanita
  • Hermes
  • Hermes reformulations batch codes
  • Infini
  • Instant Extreme
  • interview
  • J'adore
  • Jane Fonda
  • Jazz
  • Jean Patou
  • Jicky
  • Johnny Depp
  • Juliette Binoche
  • Knize Ten
  • Kouros
  • Krizia
  • La Nuit de l'Homme
  • Lancome
  • Lanvin
  • Laroche
  • Lauder
  • LIDG
  • LIDGE
  • LIDL
  • Lost in Translation
  • Luca Turin
  • M7
  • Miscellaneous
  • Missoni
  • Molinard
  • Moulin Rouge
  • Mugler
  • Muguet de Bonheur
  • News
  • niche perfumery
  • Opium
  • Paco Rabanne
  • Perfume Guide.
  • perfumes
  • Pierre Cardin
  • reformulation
  • reformulations
  • reformulations.
  • retro
  • review
  • review.
  • Reviews
  • Rita Hayworth
  • Rive Gauche
  • Robert Piguet
  • Robert Vadim
  • Rochas
  • Rubini
  • Samsara
  • scents
  • scientific approach
  • Serge Lutens
  • side-by-side test.
  • Smell Festival
  • Smelling
  • Spray
  • Steve McQueen
  • Strips
  • Ted Lapidus
  • Tests
  • Then&Now
  • Thoughts
  • Valentino
  • Van Cleef & Arpels
  • Vero Kern
  • Versace
  • Vetiver
  • vintage
  • vintage advertisement
  • vintage perfumes
  • vintage Pour un Homme
  • White Linen
  • Yatagan
  • YSL
  • YSL pour Homme
  • Yves Saint Laurent

Blog Archive

  • February 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • November 2016 (4)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (1)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (3)
  • March 2016 (2)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (2)
  • December 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • August 2015 (4)
  • July 2015 (4)
  • June 2015 (7)
  • May 2015 (6)
  • April 2015 (7)
  • March 2015 (6)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (3)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (2)
  • April 2014 (7)
  • March 2014 (13)
  • February 2014 (13)
  • January 2014 (10)
  • December 2013 (11)
  • November 2013 (17)
  • October 2013 (8)
Powered by Blogger.

Report Abuse

  • Home

About Me

niten
View my complete profile

Search This Blog